Hi Terry! On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Terry Lin wrote:
> Hi, > > We have two Nagios one is version 1.x and the other one is version 2.9 and > both use LDAP to login. > I just setup a new Nagios version 2.11 and it won?t work for LDAP. > Here are the files that I checked: > /etc/httpd/conf.d/nagios.conf > /etc/httpd/conf.d/authz_ldap.conf > > /usr/local/nagios/etc/cgi.cfg --> > I checked every single Authentication settings but each setting Is the same > as my previous servers. > I don?t know if I have missed anything in this file or I have to mess around > other files. > > /usr/local/nagios/etc/nagios.cfg > > But I login as my LDAP users and the browser told me I am not an authorized > user as below??? > > It appears as though you do not have permission to view information for any > of the services you requested... > If you believe this is an error, check the HTTP server authentication > requirements for accessing this CGI > and check the authorization options in your CGI configuration file. First, it doesn't matter which version of Nagios you use, since Nagios doesn't handle authentication. Howver, you haven't said anything about what may be different in the two webserver versions, and that's what's important. Since you haven't provided any information about how authentication is configured or what you're doing it with, the best I can do is tell you to see the documentation for your webserver to see to do LDAP authentication. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
