Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> I know that lots of the documentation about how to configure Nagios's
> cfg files is in transition from 2.x (where you mostly did it one way)
> to 3.0 (where you mostly do it another way), but there's a point I'm
> not clear on.
>
> It seems to me that it would be much easier to maintain if member
> machines were placed in hostgroups *in each member machine's cfg file*
> (cause yes, I'm using a separate file for each machine).
>
You can do that.
> This doesn't seem to be the way Nagios expects me to do it, and I don't
> see that there's a way to do it this way; you appear to have to define
> the hostgroup in some amorphous 'somewhere', and then add all the hosts
> to it *there* (which means that there are two places you have to change
> when you add a new host, which I'm not fond of).
>
Not really, no, but the hostgroup needs to be defined somewhere. When it
is, you can do something like the following
define host {
use template_with_all_required_variables
hostgroups hostgroup1,hostgroup2,hostgroup4,hostgroupn
}
--
Andreas Ericsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
