Why don't you like check_load?

I wouldn't mind a CPU at 100% if no process is waiting to be run, would you?

Cheers


17 Jul 2008 15:31:02 -0000, Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Friends,
>
> I would love to have thoughts on monitoring CPU for Linux.(without using
> check_load).
>
> Looking for some output like SAR output.
>
> Thank you,
> Nair
>
>
>   [image: Rediff 
> Shopping]<http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-default.htm/[EMAIL
>  PROTECTED]/2206641_2199021/2201651/1?PARTNER=3&OAS_QUERY=null>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Reply via email to