On Feb 6, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Rahul Nabar wrote: > I've been adding a bunch of checks via NRPE on remote nodes and this > got me thinking. Isn't it inefficient to keep starting check_nrpe > calls from the monitoring host all the time? > > Why cannot nrpe on the remote node monitor some of the local > services and only send a message back to nagios if there is a status > change?
> > Just curious. Or maybe there is a way of achieving this already that > I don't know of! Passive checks with NSCA is pretty close, minus the 'if there is a status change' part. You could build that logic into whatever wrapper you are using to run the plugins on the remote host though. From the perspective of the nagios host, passive checks are much better than active checks. -- Marc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
