On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Andreas Ericsson <e...@op5.com> wrote:
> Morten Guldager wrote:
>
>>
>> How come that I get a warning if I omit the "check_period" on services
>> while
>> it seems to be ok to leave it out on the hosts?
>>
>>
> Because it's something one normally wants to associate with a service.
But not with a host... well, I had hoped for a more consistent logic here.
And how?
>>
>
> By checking the service as if you'd defined a timeperiod encompassing all
> the
> hours of all days (I think). It could also be by not checking the service
> at
> all, which one could argue is actually correct. Try and find out.
My trials here shows that it tests 24x7 if I omit the check_period. Fine
thats what I want.
But as you point out yourself too, the logic is not straigth forward here.
--
/Morten %-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
