> With parallel checks in Nagios 3 and some configuration tuning and > well-written SNMP checks, I'd argue that Nagios is as good if not a > better poller than cactid :). our instance is not huge, but > currently we do 7000+ SNMP-based checks in 3 minutes on a dual > quad-core Linux-based server. > > Before PNP I used to use Cacti and Nagios. I like Cacti, but with PNP > around I would never go back to that combination again .. Nagios + PNP > really does simplify life for Nagios administrators and provides a lot > of flexibility as far as how you scale your graphing as your node base > grows. > > - Max
Hi Max, Do you all of your SNMP management manually? I'm still learning a lot about SNMP, and was under the impression that Cacti took a lot of the pain out of SNMP management, but I'd be interested in hearing how you administer it in your system just using Nagios + PNP4Nagios if you don't mind? Cheers, Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null