Ok, I remove the nrpe side and configured instead my service for the host.
I changed it to this: define service{ use local-service host_name serveip1.csaa..com service_description SMTP check_command check_smtp!/check_smtp -p 25 -w 5 -c 8 -t 100 } Am I missing something? Thanks. ________________________________ From: Mathew Walker <lmw94...@hotmail.com> To: deibert...@yahoo.com; nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2009 9:58:22 AM Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] check_smtp issue What is your service configuration? If you're checking SMTP remotely, there is no need for NRPE here. I would guess your service configuration is not passing the correct variables. -- Mat W. - http://www.techadre.com/ ________________________________ Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:04:49 -0700 From: deibert...@yahoo.com To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nagios-users] check_smtp issue I have setup check_smtp in my Nagios to possibly check smtp flow. I have manually tested initiated this command and seems to be ok: nag...@servedhcp1~/libexec# ./check_smtp -H serveip1.csaa.com -w 3 -c 5 -t 100 SMTP OK - 0.003 sec. response time|time=0.002578s;3.000000;5.000000;0.000000 Configured my cfgs in command.cfg: define command{ command_name check_smtp command_line $USER1$/check_smtp -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -p 25 -w $ARG1$ -c $ARG2$ -t $ARG3$ } Configured on host nrpe: command[check_smtp]=/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_smtp -p 25 -w 5 -c 8 -t 100 However when I check nagios page, I'm getting this error: check_smtp: Warning time must be a positive integer Any ideas on why this is happening? Please advise. Thanks! DB ________________________________ Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null