I swear that spec file wasn't there before your email! ;) Sorry for
not noticing that, I'm sure that will be just what I'm looking for.
Thanks,
Neil
Marc Powell wrote:
On Aug 3, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Neil Dombrowski wrote:
Anyone know why Redhat's repository has such an old version of nagios
(2.12)?
Redhat can answer better but my guess is that 3.x had just come out of
RC when they were testing 5.3 maybe?
I have to install from a RedHat/Fedora repository, or build the
rpm myself. I'll see if I can find out what version Fedora is using,
but
does someone know where I can get reliable spec files for a recent
version of nagios & nagios-plugins?
Is the spec file included in the tarball unreliable?
--
Marc
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
--
Neil Dombrowski
Linux Administration
Pricegrabber.com
608-215-6183
AIM: neilatpg
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
