Is there a utility out there that will read the timeperiods and display
oncall rotations?

Or, is there a "who is on call today" utility?

Thanks,

   Dale

-- 
Dale J. Chatham
d...@chatham.org

                                          _.oo.
                  _.u[[/;:,.         .odMMMMMM'
               .o888UU[[[/;:-.  ....@p^    MMM^
              oN88888UU[[[/;::-.        dP^
             dNMMNN888UU[[[/;:--.   ....@p^
            ,MMMMMMN888UU[[/;::-. o...@^
            NNMMMNN888UU[[[/~...@p^
            888888888UU[[[/o...@^-..
           oI8888UU[[[/o...@p^:--..
        ....@^  YUU[[[/o...@^;::---..
      oMP     ^/o...@p^;:::---..
   .dMMM    ....@^ ^;::---...
  dmmmm...@^`       `^^^^
YMMMUP^
  ^^


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and 
focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when 
reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Reply via email to