Michael Friedrich writes: > Well I've sent a patch a few months ago to nagios-devel but iirc it's > only in CVS, not within a new beta release. An Icinga user pointed me to > that problem. > > http://markmail.org/message/jsolx6j6jl74aqpj > https://dev.icinga.org/issues/219
I caught one of those (the errant declaration) but missed the botched int vs. long problem. Since I located the patch, I'll give things another go this evening if I get time. Thanks! > I'd recommend staying at 1.4b7 since 1.4b9 SQL schema is a bit screwed > regarding unique constraints next to the binary selects instead of case > sensitive collation. I looked at the lists and didn't see the indices and constraints alluded to here. Can you point them out, please. I'll back out the changes I applied to the database with the 1.4b9 update. However, 1.4b9 *does* provide some additional indices that dramatically speed up certain maintenance operations, so I don't want to lose those. Cheers! +-----------------------------------------+----------------------------+ | Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | Natick, Massachusetts, USA | | Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | 01760-2098 | | mailto:carl_fri...@mathworks.com +----------------------------+ | http://users.rcn.com/crfriend/museum | ICBM: +42:18:00 -71:21:03 | +-----------------------------------------+----------------------------+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
