Well, assuming we can get snmpd set up to allow gets despite EMC's claim, we'd be attempting to monitor the celerra's datamover via the CS. As far as I understand, snmpd runs on the CS, so that's where our queries would have to go. It's still an open question whether we'd be picking up DM data at that point, or whether we'd only be seeing data for the CS.
As to what and why I'm looking to monitor this way - I'm in a large organization with a Nagios implementation that I maintain. But I don't maintain the Celerra's. So I'd much prefer to handle all the check and threshold definitions within Nagios, rather than having to learn the Celerra config, and then having to poke the guy who does maintain them until he gets them set properly. May not work out that way, but I'm at least going to give it a shot. Cheers, Erik ----- Original Message ---- From: James Pratt <jpr...@norwich.edu> To: Nagios Users List <nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Tue, October 5, 2010 9:33:06 AM Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Monitoring an EMC Celerra From: olourkin-nag...@yahoo.com [mailto:olourkin-nag...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 12:20 PM To: Nagios Users List Subject: [Nagios-users] Monitoring an EMC Celerra Hi all - Been digging around to try to figure out how to enable SNMP gets against an EMC Celerra so that I can implement active checks in Nagios. I have traps set up, but I much prefer active checks whenever possible. Problem is, EMC support says the Celerra isn't capable of allowing gets. I've heard and suspected otherwise, so I thought I'd check the list to see if anyone's made the necessary config changes to allow gets. I think it should be a matter of changing /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf, but has anyone tried? Thanks, Erik Larkin --- I guess having skipped bothering to implement this at our site, i look at this a different sort of way, and ask - are you attempting to monitor the celerra 's datamover via the CS (Control station?), or directly against the dm(s)? I'm not sure what you wish to monitor either - the celerras have some pretty good internal alerting configs if you dig around ... at least they have worked fine for us. what are you attempting to do specifically , like monitor just health / temp stuff, or filesystem/share usage etc etc? I'm also curious because i use SNMP gets here extensively, just never bothered against the celerra... cheers, James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
