Hi, On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Paul M. Dubuc <w...@paul.dubuc.org> wrote: > As long as any hosts that match the host_name directive have no services > defined, you will get this error. The escalation apparently wants to have > host/service pairs. It's a service escalation and all services must be > assigned to a host. It doesn't automatically discard hosts that have no > services.
But as you can see in the above config I posted, I am explicitly excluding those hosts which do not have any services associated with them ( foo.com and bar.com ). Hence, the config should be valid. Unless ofcourse: host_name *. !host1, !host2 is not the right way to include all hosts except host1 and host2 or some other bad logic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
