Quoting Jim Avery: > The send_nsca transmission identifies the host to Nagios so it won't matter if the address is NATted.
Hi Jim, ok great if its possible, however I did try setting this up and it didnt seem to work. I am using the NSClient++ on Windows servers, and under the NSCA section I have defined what is described as "LOCAL HOST NAME" correctly on each client. However when both clients are configured on the Nagios server updates are received to one and not the other, which makes me think its just asscoiating all inbound messages with the first matching IP (I have defined each host with an IP, I guess that is required too isnt it?), If it isn't to do with the host definition having an IP defined then maybe I made some other config mistake, I can double check it all on Monday. thanks Andy. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
