FYI: Sprint did something this morning such that those sites are now checking cleanly with check_http.
Frank ________________________________________ From: Frank Bulk [frnk...@iname.com] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 8:27 AM To: 'Paul Dubuc'; 'Nagios Users List' Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] check_http fails for two Sprint sites Yes, I did -- no go. You can test it yourself -- there's nothing special about where I'm testing it from. =) It's clear that check_http is choking on it, and I suspect it's because it redirects to a secure version of the site. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Paul Dubuc [mailto:w...@paul.dubuc.org] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 8:26 AM To: frnk...@iname.com; Nagios Users List Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] check_http fails for two Sprint sites Frank Bulk wrote: > Starting this morning two IPv6 sites, www.sprint.net and www.sprintv6.net > failed to pass check_http. What's strange is that the v4 version of > www.sprint.net also fails. > > I see that there are 302's (redirection) to the secure version of the site, > but using the '-f follow' command doesn't help, either. It seems that if > the site one being is redirected to is secure that the check command fails. > Did you try any of the other options for -f, like '-f sticky' or '-f stickyport'? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
