On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Joe Abley wrote: > > On 19-Feb-2007, at 11:20, Gadi Evron wrote: > > > I am very pleased with the current AUP. The discussion seems to be > > about > > day-to-day maintenance and enforcement. > > Ah, then the interpretation of the AUP by the AUP differs from your > interpretation of the AUP. Unfortunately (for you) it's the MLC's > interpretation that matters. Three options seem open to you: > > 1. You might consider drafting an AUP amendment which clarifies the > areas in which different interpretations currently exist. > > 2. If you believe that the MLC is acting inappropriately, you might > address your concerns to the SC so that they can consider them. > > 3. You could find another list whose administrators are more amenable > to the content you wish to distribute, and stop trying to disseminate > it on NANOG. > > The state of things today is that you should expect to abide by the > recommendations of the MLC, and if you persist in posting messages to > the list after you have received warnings, you can expect the MLC to > react according to their normal procedures. This is not any kind of > official warning (I am not part of the MLC, and I do not presume to > speak for them, or to do their job); you should read it simply as > commentary about a process.
Quite right! Now, did we reach any solutions in this thread? Or are we going to get back to it in 2 weeks? > > > Joe >
