> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:35:29 -0600 > From: Sean Figgins <s...@labrats.us> > > On 10/6/10 2:50 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I guess I miss the point. When I can go to > > nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/agenda.php and watch and listen to the full > > meeting, why would I need a transcopt? > > Not everyone can make the community meeting. The community meeting is > not always broadcast. Not everyone will be able to understand who is > asking what question. > > For the general conference, I agree that it does not always need to have > transcripts. But as the community meeting is likely the place where > corporate business is being discussed, this needs to be reviewable at a > later date I do not know it this is a legal requirement at all, but I > know that most incorporated organizations I have participated in have > pretty decent transcripts or minutes from their business meetings.
I don't quite understand this. The community meeting has been recorded for the past 3 years (9 meetings). I would think that the recording would both meet legal requirements and allow a transcript to be made later. At most, we might need a recording secretary to take notes, but this does not require a stenographer. Matt does an excellent job of it now and getting someone to take notes for pay would still be far less expensive that hiring a stenographer. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: ober...@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
