It seems people are confusing “source of truth” with “intended truth”, or maybe 
people have a different definition of truth than I do.

The network is always the only source of truth as it is what is actually 
deployed in the network, it is the truth about what is, while I can intend for 
that truth to be different, that doesn’t change the reality of the situation. 

Shane

> On Mar 19, 2025, at 12:54 PM, borg--- via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, you are right here. There is tooling that is able to dump all configs
> from network devices and compare it to docs and generate reports.
> 
> I never had to use something like this, but seems usefull to enforce
> state of trust from documentation.. If deviation is detected,
> it have to be fixed right away.. And is even easy to blame who made
> deviation. You can use 'svn blame' from docs and access log from devices.
> 
> In my small team (5 ppl) it was solved by saying: docs is the only
> source of trust, if you find deviation, docs telling the true.
> In case of complains, 'svn blame' + logs to the rescue.
> 
> 
> ---------- Original message ----------
> 
> From: Mns Nilsson via NANOG <[email protected]>
> To: North American Network Operators Group <[email protected]>
> Cc: Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>,
>    Mns Nilsson <[email protected]>
> Subject: [NANOG] Re: The Network CLI -- Love it ? Hate it? Needed?
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:37:30 +0100
> 
>> A *proposed* state or maybe even a snapshot of a particular time is more
>> likely.
> 
> Documentation that deviates from reality will get ignored, forgotten
> and rejected.  Treating it as plans and intents will work much better.
> We probably do that without reflecting over it already. Officially
> acknowledging it will only improve the process.
> 
> --
> M˙˙ns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
> MN-1334-RIPE           SA0XLR            +46 705 989668
> Xerox your lunch and file it under "sex offenders"!
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/4UUWI6QOZV2NI4LIUXZE6FI5KHGEWDZL/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/N3RZ6WKQWI76ZLAOOL5CE7FGMUBATQQ2/

Reply via email to