Hi Tom,
Il giorno lun 31 mar 2025 alle ore 18:03 Tom Beecher <[email protected]> ha scritto: > As the author states the data is coming from the peering DB datasets, >> are you implying there is an error in the extractions/the datasets >> themselves? or that the data in the peering db datasets does not >> correlate to the real world? >> I believe the later but wanted to make sure I am not missing something > > > Example : https://burdantes.github.io/cdn_facility_evol_timeseries.html > > Double click on Yahoo to select that trace. It states that Yahoo only > exists in 2 interconnection facilities since December of 2023. Now take a > look at PeeringDB : https://www.peeringdb.com/net/27 . We're in a lot > more than 2, and have been for at least a decade, maybe two. > > My assumption is that the author likely used one of our OTHER ASNs in > PeeringDB , not AS10310 which is our primary one. > > If *my* data displayed is so wildly incorrect, it's fair to question how > accurate the data may or may not be for anyone else. > Thanks for the clarification. It makes me wonder how much that impacts the claim that pop turnover is faster than expected. Brian _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/PIAP6ZJMSFYI43ZLVKNSR6DDMDDFQOHZ/
