On 4/9/25 21:13, Gary Sparkes wrote:
I would say that NMC is older than LFP because it was invented far beforehand.
It's what enabled the transition off of NiMH and NiCAD - invented sometime
around the 1980s. I've got many examples from the late 90s and early 2000s, one
of my favorite being the iPaq 3850 sitting on my desk (and of course, tons and
tons of cellular phones). But that's obviously not stationary....
LiFePo4 is far newer - late 90s/early 2000s - and not commercially viable until
later.
LFP makes more sense in a lot of applications because of voltages - it can be a
"drop in" replacement for 12V systems due to the 3.2V nominal - and
lifespan/cycle count.
But NMC was commercialized far earlier in fixed storage, mostly apparent to me
in the availability of house-scale lithium battery systems/solar, lithium UPS
market at all scales, from 1U / switch rack units to full scall datacenter
deployments. And Including according to some cursory research, grid-scale power
systems as well - as LiFePo4 tech is still relatively new and developing.
EV usage was more a selection because of density, but not a driver of that
density development. Even EVs are moving in the LFP direction for safety
reasons as that technology evolves. EVs using non-NMC existed before as well,
due to technology limitations and evolution.
Largely agree, yes.
Schneider's forecast in 2017 or 2018 for 40% of the datacenter market to be
lithium based by around 2025.
It's going to be a mind shift... like moving network operators across
from 100G-LR4 plugs to 100G-FR1. Seems obvious, but is unnecessarily
complicated :-).
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/VS5TZH3R2BDKBZP3IQM3UZLHTEWK2LZV/
