Look at TWAMP, no NID required.
> On Apr 30, 2025, at 8:32 PM, Aaron1 <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > > Interesting talk. I’ve been wanting to dive deeper into this topic for a > while. > > Do you all know if I can easily enable these types of OAM on my mpls > pseudowire/vpls through my mpls cloud in Juniper Junos? > > Furthermore, can I also send some sort of OAM on my ENNI vlan subinterfaces > to pump synthetic OAM pdu’s through neighboring operator clouds towards a > remote nid I manage (Accedian)? This is similar to what someone previously > mentioned about measuring third-party clouds that are abstracted from their > point of view, but can at least get some sort of measurement. > > Currently, we plug in Accesian NID’s at various places in the network and run > Y.1731 or RFC2544, but as I mentioned in the previous paragraph, I would like > to insert points along the way in my network and furthermore through my > neighboring operator clouds as well. > > Aaron > >> On Apr 30, 2025, at 7:08 PM, sronan--- via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> >> wrote: >> >> Take a look at TWAMP, which may solve your problems. >> >> Shane >> >>>> On Apr 30, 2025, at 7:56 AM, James Bensley via NANOG >>>> <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote: >>> >>> latency, and packet loss of the service, and in the case of multi-segment >>> pseudowires check this e2e, and for each segment. We also wanted to provide >>> link-loss forwarding for the services. Finally, we wanted to allow our >>> customers to also use CFM over our service, so we used levels 0-3 >>> internally, and passed levels 4-7 transparently >> _______________________________________________ >> NANOG mailing list >> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/52REISY2NM4B2W64JR5G4XMPD2TUMKNC/ > _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/ZKHZSP4TPUBJ4HHPYJ2A6N62ZW6DOSWL/
