On Wed, 2025-05-14 at 11:51 +0200, Bill Woodcock via NANOG wrote: > > > > On May 14, 2025, at 08:16, Andrew Latham via NANOG > > <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote: > > And outages-discuss...@outages.org is there also! > > Yes. Virendra, correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe that the > intention is for people to post _new_ outage notifications to > outa...@outages.org, but that _replies to_ and discussion of those go > to outages-discuss...@outages.org. So, if you want to follow and > participate in discussion of the outage events, subscribe to both > lists. If you’re just interested in seeing new events, but not > ongoing discussion of them (or if you’re using automation to track > events) just subscribe to outa...@outages.org and you should see a > much higher signal-to-noise ratio (addressing the many requests for > this over the years). > > -Bill --------- Initially, the intention was for replies to be directed to outages- discussion@. However, they are currently being directed to outages@. I have updated the footer to remind everyone that post post discussion replies should be directed to outages-discussion@
Will monitor to see how this plays out. /vrode > > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/SYHOUVWUXDFTIHZ4QWY3DNRYNE77GD7T/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/53V5ILX5A3HOPFR2A75VEWPLJPZ767RJ/
