John Levine via NANOG <[email protected]> writes: > This is a waste of time. If people want to believe that SMTP clients send > certificates, there's not much I can do to persuade them otherwise.
Let's just disagree then. But when my secondary MX receives an email and later forwards it to my primary MX over a mTLS channel, then I call that SMTP. If you want to call it submission because the secondary MX operates as an authenticated client, then fine. > But in any event, I hope we have established that the number of people > affected by the LE change to stop signing client certs rounds to zero. Sure. Bjørn _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/AIZ7R7U66GNBAFU5NHDVAVOFJCZCKPEK/
