rubensk> According to BCP-140, no, not a good thing. ebersman> That BCP is from 2015...
rubensk> RFC 1035 is still what defines DNS, hasn't been obsoleted and rubensk> is from 1987. Perhaps age is not the main factor in defining rubensk> obsolescence ? Blind adherence to 10+ year old BCPs rather than current experience and competence is a bad idea. And 1035 has had literally hundreds of more current RFCs to clarify... Also, when someone asks for a serious "is this still a good idea" and someone just goes "BCP blah says", you're not adding to the discussion. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RRBNRMKS2UL7LUQIA4KX5WTPNPNB4EMG/
