I think that’s the nature of unidirectional ip flow.  Unless source-based PBR, 
FBF, or uRPF (iirc, strict) is in use, seems that’s how regular IP works in a 
unidirectional manner

Aaron

> On Aug 19, 2025, at 11:37 AM, Jonathan Kalbfeld via NANOG 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This happens unintentionally quite a bit with misconfigured NAT. You will see 
> RFC 1918 source addresses in packets from time to time. I can't speak to the 
> application or value of this, but I have seen this and done it accidentally 
> on one occasion.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jonathan Kalbfeld
> 
> office:   +1 310 317 7933
> fax:         +1 310 317 7901
> home:       +1 310 317 7909
> mobile:   +1 310 227 1662
> 
>  ThoughtWave Technologies, Inc.
> Studio City, CA 91604
> 
> https://thoughtwave.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> View our network at  
> 
> https://bgp.he.net/AS54380
> 
> 
> 
> +1 844 42-LINUX
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> On Aug 19, 2025 at 9:34 AM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) via NANOG  
>> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Question: Can a prefix be never routed on the Internet but used only one-way 
>> for source address in IP packets?
>> 
>> That is. a user owns an IP prefix. They never advertise a route to it in BGP 
>> on the Internet. But they use the prefix solely for source address in IP 
>> traffic from a source to a destination (sink). In this set up, the 
>> destination server obviously cannot/doesn't return any acknowledgements etc. 
>> to the source. Anyone aware if there is any such known application in use on 
>> the Internet - even if it is rare? Thanks.
>> 
>> Sriram
>> _______________________________________________
>> NANOG mailing list
>> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/MSEGDFSZ75EMKVD2FWPFSJBOB24X5GQR/
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/POV2RZVCP3NZUR7O4WEUA3WKVFRMIKK7/

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/4EGLYGWYKABRMQ4I4TO7MIHHHVQCK5ES/

Reply via email to