Huge respect for admitting that ARIN uses Excel as an IPAM solution.  You
are braver than I...

I'll see myself out.



On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 12:29 PM John Curran via NANOG <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Chase (and the NANOG operator community) –
>
> Apologies for not replying earlier, but I wanted to make sure we
> understood exactly what went wrong and had that written up as an incident
> report (i.e., rather than responding piecemeal and without full clarity).
>
> Short version – ARIN failed here (as you noted in your post). We’ve
> published a public incident report that lays out what happened, the impact,
> and what we’re changing:  https://www.arin.net/announcements/20251212/
>
> This came down to some remaining manual handling around NRPM 4.10 space,
> which uses a sparse allocation model and wasn’t yet fully integrated into
> our automated inventory. That gap allowed your already in-use IPv4 /24
> block to be mistaken as available and reissued to another customer. When it
> was removed and reissued, your associated ROA was removed as well, along
> with reverse DNS services, etc.
>
> We had plans to automate our NRPM 4.10 inventory management (largely for
> efficiency reasons), but this incident and subsequent review showed that
> the remaining manual steps pose more risk than is reasonable. As a result,
> we’ve moved that work well up the priority list for development. In the
> meantime, and as detailed in the incident report, we’ve put additional
> controls in place – including a mandatory second review on any resource
> deletion from an organization – to prevent this from happening again.
>
> I will also be reviewing our number resource inventory management
> practices internally (and with the ARIN Board of Trustees) to ensure there
> are not any other similar situations that might pose such a risk. My
> deepest apologies for this incident; we are acutely aware that the
> integrity of Internet number resources is essential to network operators,
> and thus it must be inherent to ARIN’s performance at all times.
>
> Sincerely,
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> American Registry for Internet Numbers
>
> On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:19 PM, Chase via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hey NANOG,
>
>
>
> After receiving a BGPAlerter notification that one of our subnets (
> 23.150.164.0/24) had been hijacked, I checked and noticed the prefix in
> question was missing RPKI. Assuming I had fat fingered something and
> butchered the ROA, I logged into ARIN and found that the prefix was missing
> from our resource list entirely, and had been reallocated to another
> organization and announced from their network. I created a ticket in ARIN
> and called immediately.
>
>
>
> They confirmed that our subnet had been accidentally reallocated to
> another customer, and that they are currently working on returning it to
> us. After a couple hours, they told us the other organization will stop
> announcing the prefix, and WHOIS will be returned shortly.
>
>
>
> I’m guessing there’s no way to prevent this kind of thing on our side if
> the RPKI ROA itself is removed along with the allocation? I’m planning on
> adding checks to look for missing ROAs (in addition to invalid/expiring
> ones), which I'm guessing would've caught this earlier.
>
>
>
> Have any of you had anything like this happen with ARIN or another RIR?
> I’m especially curious what might have happened if we’d only noticed and
> reached out a few weeks later instead of within a few minutes.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Chase Lauer
>
> GalaxyGate, AS397031
>
> https://galaxygate.net
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5MCMSACQADNXE65BTK34MQ3PXY4PDETF/
>
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/FY3SDD72W5OFTJHIPHMB46JBGQFE2G6G/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/GFXWK5YNHSOFDEYI63Q6WA5RIP454GFW/

Reply via email to