Is QUIC also affected in any way? Sent from my iPhone
> On 26 Dec 2025, at 22:31, Tim Burke via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the general stance, at least in my opinion, is that it may be > acceptable for a non-fixed broadband service (e.g., cell phone service), > while it is not for a fixed broadband (FTTP or otherwise). I fully expect > CGNAT, a basic level of packet mangling in an effort to maximize performance > on the cell network, etc., while I am hopping between several different cell > towers in an area along with thousands of other users, in an effort to > improve the experience of services commonly used on a cell phone… but not so > much if I am sitting in my house, connected via my own network, to a wired > broadband connection. > >> On Dec 25, 2025, at 5:44 PM, andrew--- via NANOG <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> So the tl;dr I'm getting from this is that >> >> - I don't think anyone considers this 'acceptable' for an ISP >> >> - Everyone knows that AT&T does it anyway >> >> I haven't found any documentation on how or why AT&T is actually doing this, >> so it's all either very old or they've scrubbed it from the internet (I know >> they deleted their whole forums, and it seems like some of the discussion >> was formerly there) >> _______________________________________________ >> NANOG mailing list >> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/NFUAW4XI2Z3UGC2OHIO457D6KSNWMJU6/ > > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/J3ZFZOA4MU5UBIO3UBJQNGMKYDMUGWTR/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/R4WFPPZ4KXIGZUJC6QC5TCUQQIHGKYHQ/
