Which is a lot like my comment on the law:

If a judge in their court room orders you to raise your right leg you
are well-advised to raise your right leg.

If they order you to also raise your left leg they don't have a
problem, you have a problem.

On February 17, 2026 at 04:24 [email protected] (John Curran via NANOG) 
wrote:
 > One observation from watching similar debates over the years – the period in 
 > which the Internet technical community could simply respond “that isn’t 
 > technically possible” or “that won’t work as intended” and expect the 
 > proposed law or regulation to stall seems largely behind us.
 > 
 > In many jurisdictions, if policymakers perceive a requirement as necessary, 
 > they now proceed regardless. The practical effect of disengagement is often 
 > not the abandonment of the mandate, but its advancement with less 
 > operational and technical input.
 > 
 > I recognize this is not particularly pleasant for those operating networks, 
 > but it does suggest that the strategic choice that technical communities now 
 > face is deciding how and when to participate to shape discussions toward 
 > more pragmatic outcomes – since there will be outcomes, and fewer & more 
 > feasible approaches definitely beats the alternative. 
 > 
 > FYI,
 > /John
 > 
 > p.s. Disclaimers: my views alone; your mileage may vary; this email composed 
 > with 100% recycled electrons...
 > 
 > > On Feb 16, 2026, at 11:21 PM, nanog--- via NANOG <[email protected]> 
 > > wrote:
 > > 
 > > It would be nice if bad laws were impossible to comply with. Then nobody 
 > > would comply with them.
 > > 
 > > Then someone comes along and finds there's a way to sell the appearance of 
 > > complying with the law (even though actual compliance is impossible) as a 
 > > service, and everybody is forced to buy the service so they don't get 
 > > prosecuted.
 > > 
 > > Just one more instance of bad politics and capitalism messing everything 
 > > up for everybody.
 > > 
 > > 
 > > On 16 February 2026 15:08:46 CET, Michael Greenup via NANOG 
 > > <[email protected]> wrote:
 > >> It is important to consider the extent to which US state government 
 > >> mandates influence the regulation of content access. For instance, 
 > >> numerous states now require identity verification for viewers of adult 
 > >> content to confirm their age. Many of these laws are formulated such that 
 > >> any viewer within the state's jurisdiction must be verified, 
 > >> necessitating IP address-based geolocation to ensure compliance.
 > >> 
 > >> Not saying I agree or disagree here, just laying out a regulated use case.
 > >> 
 > >> YMMV.
 > >> 
 > >> Regards,
 > >> 
 > >> Michael
 > >> 
 > >> The views and opinions included in this email belong to the author and 
 > >> are not representative of the views and opinions of the company which 
 > >> employs me. If you find a spelling or grammatical error, you may keep it.
 > >> 
 > >> Rich Kulawiec wrote:
 > >>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 10:25:56PM -0800, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
 > >>>> Personally, I???ve always thought that IP Geolocation was a bad idea
 > >>>> and nothing I???ve seen in the usage of it to date has changed my mind.
 > >>>> Agree.  We've spent decades trying to build a network that allows 
 > >>>> everyone
 > >>> to access everything independent of geographical location, and now people
 > >>> have come along with broken business models which demand that we abandon
 > >>> this fundamental principle of the Internet in order to accomodate them.
 > >>> 
 > >>> ---rsk
 > >> _______________________________________________
 > >> NANOG mailing list 
 > >> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VT47D47CAP6GHJWQARWCY5Z7N3EXJPUK/
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > NANOG mailing list 
 > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LYLXWZI7QLGDP5P5YWEHMY6NXDIJKGWF/
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > NANOG mailing list 
 > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/2UKQXS3SZK4JHCW52URJAVTNIQPPQWO2/

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | [email protected]             | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/4CRA3EA4IQBHCLJSAYAN77PNUROPRE2E/

Reply via email to