Tom,
Thanks for your perspective. I do appreciate the Hanlon's Razor point —
it's a good general principle.
However, in this case, the same ASN also:
- Manually injected China Telecom's IPv6 backbone (`240e::/20`) into its
BIRD config on May 1
- Submitted a new ASN (`AS402333`) on May 16, the day of the leak
- Maintains a global geofeed that still lists a Shanghai node as of May
22
If that's not malice, then perhaps it's a very, very advanced form of
stupidity.
Either way, the evidence is archived.
me
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RQHULVRN22K4PLHAY66I33733WOAO3MF/
