Hello,

I use FRR a lot in ISPs that I work for, but in cases of RR I prefer to use 
GoBGP or BIRD. I prefer GoBGP or Bird instead FRR because they are easier to 
automate.

But yes, you can use FRR to do so.
[cid:[email protected]]


> On 3 Jun 2026, at 10:02, Douglas Fischer via NANOG <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
> Perhaps these excellent publications by Justin Pietsch can help you decide:
> https://medium.com/the-elegant-network/performance-testing-of-commercial-bgp-c3b93424dd6d
> I suggest reading the entire set of posts.
>
> I don't know if anyone has done analyses of this same type recently.
> If so, I'd like to read them.
>
>
> Em ter., 2 de jun. de 2026 às 18:14, Tom Samplonius via NANOG <
> [email protected]> escreveu:
>
>>
>>  Well, while I’m curious about FRR specific characteristics, I think the
>> typical BGP CPU advice still applies:
>>
>>
>> 1. Fastest possible cores.  While there are techniques to process BGP in
>> parallel (ex. sharding), BGP often tends to serialize updates.  Faster
>> cores are always better for BGP.
>>
>>
>> 2. Virtualization is just a tax.  Assume it takes 10% of your performance,
>> which is probably on the high-end for a RR.  RRs don’t forward packets, so
>> XDP and DPDK and all that stuff, do not apply.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Juniper says their container routing protocol daemon (cRPD):
>>
>> Junos cRPD is designed to maximize routing performance. For example, it is
>> capable of reflecting 10 copies of Internet routes to 1000 BGP peers in
>> less than 60 seconds.
>>
>>
>>
>>  I’m curious if FRR can do that, and what hardware that would be.
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 2, 2026, at 7:30 AM, Owens, Richard A. via NANOG <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have had this question also before. Also importantly, if you would,
>> what kind of hardware specs do your RR's have and are they physical or
>> virtual?
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Richard Owens
>>>
>>> Network Automation and Wireless Engineer | Information Technology
>> Services
>>>
>>> Old Dominion University
>>>
>>> 4300 Engineering and Computational Sciences Building
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.odu.edu/its
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: fritz--- via NANOG <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 10:09
>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: FRR for BGP route reflectors?
>>>
>>> EXTERNAL to ODU: This email is not from an ODU account. Do not click
>> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
>> content is safe.
>>>
>>> Hi Tom!
>>>
>>> We are using FRRouting on Linux VMs as dedicated BGP route reflectors
>> for AFs vpnv4, vpnv6 and evpn.
>>> Having around 1000 RR clients connected with a handful of L3VPN and a
>> few dozen EVPN instances.
>>> We don't keep the full routing table on them, but that should cause no
>> problem, just throw a bit more memory onto the VMs.
>>> BGP works like a charm on FRRouting and is also pretty good on
>> supporting recent BGP features.
>>> We can absolutely recommend it.
>>>
>>> As a sidenote: IGPs at FRRouting seem to get a bit less love, so don't
>> be too sophisticated there...
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Thomas
>>> Senior Network Engineer
>>> Init7 (AS13030)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NANOG mailing list
>>>
>> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5YPBTLAZTZ2PLG3THWK3R4J45NLLQLER/
>> <
>> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5YPBTLAZTZ2PLG3THWK3R4J45NLLQLER/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NANOG mailing list
>>>
>> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/G3JYH7XV5L7QXUF3CNZWUAGTCT6MBFFV/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NANOG mailing list
>>
>> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/BMWHVTDOGPJGEZH4X2IYC5PVWMSRCB32/
>
>
>
> --
> Douglas Fernando Fischer
> Engº de Controle e Automação
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/6JZ6ABP25IEM56TSSYYRENU4GKXVDWCH/


_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/2DXBNS52WJRRFNWTOM5DA2JFIVJUJGNW/

Reply via email to