Works fine with NAT *with the caveat that there are a lot of workarounds and netcode issues*
Without NAT it's a hell of a lot more reliable. There's a reason I ripped out all my NAT supporting code and don't support NAT scenarios outside of 1:1 NAT. -----Original Message----- From: Marco Moock via NANOG <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2026 9:13 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Marco Moock <[email protected]> Subject: Re: IPv4 flag day Am 21.06.26 um 11:21 schrieb Joe Hamelin via NANOG: > Businesses are slowly getting away from a phone on every desk due to > company issued cell phones and remote workers. I'm not sure how that > will play out with remote workers and VPN, which seem to be doing fine > with > RFC1918 space. More and more use web-based services that use WebRTC. Works fine with NAT and SPI firewalls. Teams uses that. -- Gruß Marco Junk-Mail bitte an [email protected] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/3UBD3FUV5MZIZGF3OZEFVCU5ZWDOFVZE/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/F2X6QETGKCAIAF4QV3OSX7AGPJS2OGNY/
