## On 2002-04-12 17:27 -0700 Mark Kent typed:
MK>
MK> To address Sean's point about mistakes turning one /16 into a zillion
MK> entries, is there any way to allow only some specified maximum number
MK> of routes from a bgp neighbor? I know that I'ld be happy if my
MK> upstreams gave me a buffer of, say, 10 entries above my typical number
MK> of aggregates.
MK>
MK> -mark
MK>
MK>
For Cisco IOS just add this under the "router bgp" section
---
neighbor <IP address> maximum-prefix <nnnn>
---
Exceeding the maximum prefix number will shutdown the BGP session until a
manual clear
Enjoy
Rafi
--
Rafi Sadowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network/System/Security VoiceMail: +972-3-646-0592 FAX: +972-3-649-8629
Mangler ( :-) | FIRST-REP for ILAN-CERT([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Open University of Israel | (PGP key -> ) http://telem.openu.ac.il/~rafi
- Re: genuity - any good? Simon Lyall
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy
- Re: genuity - any good? Aditya
- Re: genuity - any good? Sean Donelan
- Re: genuity - any good? David Schwartz
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent
- Route Filtering (Was: Re: genuity -... Leo Bicknell
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer
- Re: limiting # of prefixes from a B... Rafi Sadowsky
- Re: limiting # of prefixes fro... German Martinez
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin
- Re: genuity - any good? Eric Whitehill
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: genuity - any good? Adam Rothschild
- Re: genuity - any good? matthew zeier
- RE: genuity - any good? Kris Foster
- RE: genuity - any good? Kris Foster
- RE: genuity - any good? Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: genuity - any good? Jesper Skriver
