ben hubbard wrote: > why not instead lobby for a federal law, and enforcement of that > law, along with a centralized and well admin'd blacklist (who's > operations would be funded in part by proceeds from enforcement of > antispam laws). Actually, a well-written law wouldn't need funding. MAPS could make a decent income by filing class-action suits against spammers, for example. No reason for the government to get involved other than holding court. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
- Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.... Forrest W. Christian
- Re: anybody else been spammed by "no... Eric A. Hall
- Re: anybody else been spammed by &quo... Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: anybody else been spammed by ... Steven J. Sobol
- Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com&q... Forrest W. Christian
- Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.... measl
- Re: anybody else been spammed by "no... Forrest W. Christian
- Re: anybody else been spammed by &quo... Jim Mercer
- Re: anybody else been spammed by &quo... Scott A Crosby
- Re: anybody else been spammed by &quo... ben hubbard
- Re: anybody else been spammed by ... Eric A. Hall
- Re: anybody else been spammed by &quo... measl
- Re: anybody else been spammed by &quo... Scott Francis
- Re: anybody else been spammed by ... Ralph Doncaster
- Re: anybody else been spamme... Luca Filipozzi
- Re: anybody else been spamme... Forrest W. Christian
- Re: anybody else been spamme... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: anybody else been spammed by ... Mike Joseph
- Re: anybody else been spamme... Marc MERLIN
- Re: anybody else been spammed by "no... todd glassey
- Re: anybody else been spammed by "no... Terence Giufre-Sweetser
