On Mon, 13 May 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote: > As long as this is getting messy... I'm tempted to suggest > confederations. Or spending a few extra bucks on a second ASN, > although that doesn't scale. Multiple ASNs wouldn't solve anything in this case. What was wanted was under normal circumstances both A and B only announce a /20, and when the link between A and B breaks announce more specifics. Multiple ASN = inconsistent AS.. no no. - Paul
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados
- Re: BGP and aggregation E.B. Dreger
- Re: BGP and aggregation Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: BGP and aggregation Forrest W. Christian
- Re: BGP and aggregation PS
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster
- Re: BGP and aggregation E.B. Dreger
- Re: BGP and aggregation PS
- Re: BGP and aggregation Austin Schutz
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin
- Re: BGP and aggregation Roger Marquis
- Re: BGP and aggregation Forrest W. Christian
- RE: BGP and aggregation Daniska Tomas
- Re: BGP and aggregation Richard A Steenbergen
