We maintain most comprehensive whois recursive engine tool at completwhois.com
So you could also try this and get more info :)
[support@sokol support]$ whois -h completewhois.com 207.99.113.65
[completewhois.com]
[whois.arin.net]
Net Access Corporation (NETBLK-NAC-NETBLK01)
1719b Route 10E, Suite 111
Parsippany, NJ 07054
US
Netname: NAC-NETBLK01
Netblock: 207.99.0.0 - 207.99.127.255
Maintainer: NAC
Coordinator:
Net Access Corporation (ZN77-ARIN) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-638-6336
Domain System inverse mapping provided by:
NS1.NAC.NET 207.99.0.1
NS2.NAC.NET 207.99.0.2
ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
* Reassignment information for this network is available
* at whois.nac.net 43
Record last updated on 22-Aug-2001.
Database last updated on 18-May-2002 19:58:45 EDT.
The ARIN Registration Services Host contains ONLY Internet
Network Information: Networks, ASN's, and related POC's.
Please use the whois server at rs.internic.net for DOMAIN related
Information and whois.nic.mil for NIPRNET Information.
[WHOIS.NAC.NET]
NAC-Rwhoisd32 Server Ready - [silver/43] Rwhoisd32 v1.0.36
Net Access Corp. (NETBLK-NET-CF637140-28)
PO Box 55
Denville, NJ 07834
USA
Netname : NET-CF637140-28
Netblock: 207.99.113.64/28
Coordinator:
Rubenstein, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Database updated instantaneously.
This Registration Services Host contains ONLY Net Access Corporation
Network Information. Please use the whois server at whois.arin.net for
networks not found here.
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
>
>
> helium:~$ whois -a 207.99.113.65
> Net Access Corporation (NETBLK-NAC-NETBLK01)
> 1719b Route 10E, Suite 111
> Parsippany, NJ 07054
> US
>
> Netname: NAC-NETBLK01
> Netblock: 207.99.0.0 - 207.99.127.255
> Maintainer: NAC
>
> Coordinator:
> Net Access Corporation (ZN77-ARIN) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 800-638-6336
>
> Domain System inverse mapping provided by:
>
> NS1.NAC.NET 207.99.0.1
> NS2.NAC.NET 207.99.0.2
>
> ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
>
> * Reassignment information for this network is available
> * at whois.nac.net 43
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 19 May 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
>
> >
> > > > rough assessment of their network security, which was important to me
> > > > as a customer for obvious reasons.
> > >
> > > In that case, I would not consider the scan to have come from an
> > > 'unaffiliated' person. I'm sure if the bank's network operator noticed it,
> > > and contacted you, things would have been cleared up with no harm done. To
> >
> > It sounds like you know something that I don't. How do you find out the
> > contact information for someone given only an IP address?
> >
> > -Ralph
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
> -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
>
