Yes, but there is problem about the transit for the network of the IXP In my experience, some big providers only have the commercial view of internet. Really, if all the IXP members give some transit to the IXP for essential services, internet will be more robust. Daniel Intelideas On Thursday 06 June 2002 16:07, Nipper, Arnold wrote: > As a lot of people are offering secondary services: may be it's a good idea > to place infrastructural services at IXP. IXP seem to be more stable than > any ISPs and often more neutral than ISPs. > > Comments? > > > Arnold
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Bruce Campbell
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Joao Luis Silva Damas
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. John L Crain
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Jesper Skriver
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Nipper, Arnold
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Jared Mauch
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. M�ns Nilsson
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Chrisy Luke
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Daniel Concepcion
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Arnold Nipper
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. David Conrad
- RE: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Daniska Tomas
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Arnold Nipper
- RE: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Daniska Tomas
- RE: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Neil J. McRae
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. John Payne
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. bmanning
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. John Payne
