"Broke-ass" is that a new technical term?
I like it:) On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 06:39:45PM +0000, E.B. Dreger wrote: > > > > That's what happened here. Rather than transitting the traffic > > via a "last resort" across town/state, the higher local-pref of a > > "local" peer won. > > > > Geography requirements for peers aren't inherently bad. There's > > a point where things get extreme, but it would be nice to see > > nationals peer in the south as well. If one has peering > > requirements, at least set them to reach a positive goal... > > BGP twiddling cannot fix a broke-ass network design. > >
