On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:22:25 -0400, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
>
>But if you were hungrier, and they were the only place that had food,
>they *COULD* charge whatever they want, and you'd be willing to pay it,
>no?
>
>--Phil
Obviously any business would like to get the highest possible price for
anything they sell and not one dollar less. On the other hand, if a deal
provides any net benefit, once all costs are taken into account, a rational
company will take it.
So if company X refuses a deal that provides it a net benefit just because
company Y gets more out of it than company X, and as a result company Y goes
to company Z instead, company X has acted foolishly and irrationally.
DS
- Re: Sprint peering policy David Luyer
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving
- Re: Sprint peering policy Rizzo Frank
- Re: Sprint peering policy David Schwartz
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex
- RE: Sprint peering policy Paul A Flores
- RE: Sprint peering policy David Schwartz
- Game Theory (was: RE: Sprint peering po... Scott A Crosby
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal
- RE: Sprint peering policy David Schwartz
- RE: Sprint peering policy Daniel Golding
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving
- RE: Sprint peering policy Daniel Golding
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving
