--On Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:16:38 -0700 David Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given the amount of time and resource we've spent on multicast, > the question one might ask is "why hasn't multicast succeeded"? > My guess is that it is because the demand from any of the > potential users of the service just isn't there (not at internet ...and perhaps also because there is "enough" bandwidth currently, and that adding bandwidth is easier/cheaper/more stable/more well known than enabling multicast? Just a guess. - kurtis -
- RE: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) David Sinn
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) David Meyer
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Stephen Sprunk
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IP... David Meyer
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Toerless Eckert
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IP... Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness fo... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness fo... Leo Bicknell
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readine... Toerless Eckert
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Petr Swedock
- RE: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- RE: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Alexander, Nathan M
