Hmm. We don't filter, and 112942 network entries and 391859 paths using 25288182 bytes of memory On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jared Mauch wrote: > > without filtering? > > about 135k prefies last i checked. > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 04:38:48PM -0500, Rob Healey wrote: > > > > > > How big is the global BGP table running these days? > > > > 100K? 110K? Bigger? > > > > -Rob > > -- > Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. > -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
- What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Rob Healey
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table... Jared Mauch
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP t... Alex Rubenstein
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global B... Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global B... Robert Boyle
- Re: What is a reasonable range for glob... Jared Mauch
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table... Me
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table... Rob Thomas
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table... Marshall Eubanks
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP t... senthil ayyasamy
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table... Ross Chandler
- RE: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table... Kris Foster
