On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote: > > Because you could *gasp* be intelligent with your network design and do > > things like purchase transit from the same carriers in both your serving > > markets. > > I guess you don't consider redundancy to be intelligent. I do. I guess > you can call me stupid. Carriers is a plural word.. How does that not accomplish redundancy again? - Paul
- Re: solving problems inste... Brad Knowles
- Re: solving problems inste... C. Jon Larsen
- Re: solving problems inste... Paul Schultz
- Re: solving problems inste... Brad Knowles
- Re: solving problems inste... Andy Dills
- Re: solving problems inste... C. Jon Larsen
- Re: verio arrogance Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster
- Re: istop arrogance Paul Schultz
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster
- Re: istop arrogance Paul Schultz
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster
- Re: istop arrogance Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: istop arrogance Ralph Doncaster
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster
- Re: verio arrogance up
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster
- RE: verio arrogance Daniel Golding
- Re: verio arrogance Peter E. Fry
- Re: verio arrogance Kai Schlichting
- RE: verio arrogance Phil Rosenthal
