On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Nenad Trifunovic wrote: > Can you, please, explain why you didn't consider Frame Relay > based exchange in your analysis? I'd imagine because no real 'high-speed' FR switch exists (as in, oc12 or above). -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Nenad Trifunovic
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymor... William B. Norton
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymor... Alex Rubenstein
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymor... Bill Woodcock
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an... Steve Feldman
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an... William B. Norton
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sens... Petri Helenius
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymor... Nenad Trifunovic
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an... Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sens... Petri Helenius
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make ... Paul Vixie
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points ... Petri Helenius
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Poi... Paul Vixie
