> > Um. Set up more than one reflector.... > > So how many is enough? I would think 3 is a minimum to come close to the > reliability/redundancy of OSPF. I fail to see what reflectors have to do with stability (except for the obicous human errors and configuration mistakes). Reflectors and confederations is more to help with scaling. And I would then expect the number of BGP speaking routers to be up around 10-15-20. It doesn't make much sense below that (unless you are playing with the number of routes on boxes). Last I fail to see what the number of reflectors have to do with correlation to a IGP? - kurtis -
- Re: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster
- Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren
- Re: AT&T NYC Chris Woodfield
- Re: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden
- routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrou... Ralph Doncaster
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NY... Robert A. Hayden
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NY... Jason Lixfeld
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NY... Jason Lixfeld
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NY... Ross Chandler
- RE: AT&T NYC Kurtis Lindqvist
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren
- RE: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster
- Re: AT&T NYC William Waites
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford
- Re: AT&T NYC Mark Kent
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum
