On 04:36 PM 8/30/02, John M. Brown wrote: > > >Jason at XO's security/abuse staff. Very helpful chap
Indeed he is. Which is why I'm totally mystified about why rfc-ignorant insists that my domain doesn't have a working abuse address. I would privately email the admin at rfc-ignorant about this problem, but, well.... (see below) jc >From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Returned mail: User unknown >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Errors-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) >X-UIDL: 59729 > >The original message was received at Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:53:15 -0400 (EDT) >from adsl-208-201-244-240.sonic.net [208.201.244.240] > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- >... while talking to narn.megacity.org.: >>>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ><<< 550 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Message rejected because the >connecting host (wellington.concentric.net) does not have abuse contact - >see www.rfc-ignorant.org >550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown > > ----- Original message follows ----- > >Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Received: from Erwin.vo.cnchost.com (adsl-208-201-244-240.sonic.net >[208.201.244.240]) > by wellington.cnchost.com > id QAA27406; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:53:15 -0400 (EDT) > [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] >Errors-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 >Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:55:30 -0700 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: JC Dill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > >Can you explain why rfc-ignorant thinks my domain doesn't have a working >abuse address? > >jc
