At 1:00 PM -0400 2002/09/17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I imagine if you could get cisco (and other vendors) to fix their
>> transparent proxy server software to be more intelligent, that would
>> fix the problem.
>
> I suppose suggesting the use of port 587 would be pointless? ;)
Yup. He's specifically talking about the blocking of port 25.
Talking about any other ports is besides the point.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
