On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 17:03, Bryan Bradsby wrote: > > > Check out www.antispews.org > > -kyle > > There are two SPEWS lists. > > SPEWS[1] lists direct spam sources as accurately as /32
Which is the list that our corporate servers and my home lan ended up on, despite never having sent direct spam > SPEWS[2] includes SPEWS[1] plus collatteral damage. Which was the rest of our address range and that of my home ISP > to clarify, nothing more. The intent of the double spews listing is good, but it isn't adhered to in practice.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
