Arin 2003-3 was a (less detailed) attempt to do the same thing
http://www.arin.net/policy/2002_3.html
I suspect that a suitable combination of all of these proposals would have
a good chance of getting through.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 04:52 PM, Forrest wrote:
Now, however, that ARIN is discussing proposals such as 2002-5, 2002-6 andProposal 2002-7 is exactly what is needed in my opinion. I wish I'd seen
2002-7 (with 2002-5 & 2002-6 most likely being passed within few months)
ARIN maybe put in position of assigning smaller then /20 blocks and that
is why I suggested on ARIN ppml mailing list that current micro-allocation
wording about assiging small blocks from specifically designated larger
blocks be made a separate policy that would apply to all small allocations &
asignments being made directly by ARIN. If you think its a good idea to
make this a policy, please do send your feedback to ARIN or bring it up
on ppml mailing list and then ARIN can work on this futher to make it a
policy.
it before I posted here earlier, since it basically identifies every
problem I mentioned.
http://www.arin.net/policy/2002_7.html
Forrest
T.M. Eubanks Multicast Technologies, Inc. 10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.multicasttech.com Test your network for multicast : http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/ Status of Multicast on the Web : http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html
