>
>
> > The outcome of the discussions at the Address Policy SIG will be posted
> > to this list.
>
> where, one hopes, discussion will continue, yes?
>
> randy
>
why would an APNIC/AP region specific issue need to be discussed
on the NANOG list and not the RIPE/AFNOG/et.al. regional ops lists?
This is a prefix delegated to the APregion and so they should be
the ones who set the policies for the prefixes they are responsible
for. I appreciate their willingness to share the outcome of their
deliberations, but why NAites have any special say in AP policies
is a bit beyond me.
--bill
