> > Why is probing networks wrong? > > I would agree exploiting vulnerabilities discovered from probing networks > is wrong. But I don't agree that probing is inherently wrong. > > People probe networks for great reasons. Likewise, people have the ability > to prevent other people from probing their networks. > > Should we outlaw a potentially beneficial practice due to its abuse by > criminals? > Okay. What happens if you make a mistake and overload one of my devices costing my company money. I guarantee you, the law will look favorably on damages. That is the problem with probing. Sometimes the probe itself can be the damage. Programmers are human. Humans make mistakes. Programmers are perfect. -Jack
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? Kai Schlichting
- anti-spam vs network abuse jlewis
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Jack Bates
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse David Schwartz
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Roy
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Paul Vixie
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Daniel Senie
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Gary E. Miller
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Andy Dills
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Dan Hollis
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Jack Bates
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse David G. Andersen
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Richard Irving
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Charlie Clemmer
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Andy Dills
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Len Rose
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Richard Irving
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Len Rose
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Randy Bush
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Len Rose
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Rob Thomas
