>From EB Dreger > >I suggest a rotation like so: > > Jan-Apr: 69.w.w.0 > Apr-Jul: 69.x.x.255 > Jul-Oct: 70.y.y.0 > Oct-Jan: 70.z.z.255 > >where the middle two octets are predetermined ahead of time. > >IIRC, some RFC recommends updating the root zone cache monthly... >following this would ensure one had proper root/gTLD addresses. > >The above also would break DNS for broken networks for a two >month stretch... long enough to flush out bad rules. > > >Eddy Okay, let's assume that we all agree to this.. Who are the players? ARIN, gTLD Owners, and who else? Let's get some emails fired off.. Who is going to ARIN in Memphis? Jack? Dr Race? Volunteers to broach this? Any gTLD owners on list? Let's go for it.. I think this is a great Idea... Maybe we need to look at applying this elsewhere!!!! J
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Doug Barton
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox
- Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Neil J. McRae
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Jack Bates
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Michael . Dillon
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger
- RE: 69/8...this sucks McBurnett, Jim
- RE: 69/8...this sucks McBurnett, Jim
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: 69/8...this sucks Frank Scalzo
- RE: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger
- RE: 69/8...this sucks Rob Thomas
- scope of the 69/8 problem E.B. Dreger
- Re: scope of the 69/8 problem Stephen Sprunk
- Re: scope of the 69/8 problem jlewis
- Re: scope of the 69/8 problem bdragon
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Brandon Butterworth
