So as not to cluter up the list, I've posted the response/thread of email I received regarding this, complete with the "explaination" so to speak. I don't buy it, but perhaps I'm missing something. http://www.rocknyou.com/nanogspam.html I was surprised to get a response none the less.
Cheers -Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Hollis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:02 PM Subject: Semi-OT: solicitations to nanog > Just curious if anyone feels that jeff wheeler's friendster solicitation[1] > was appropriate content for the nanog ml? > -Dan > -- > [1]http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg08799.html
